A long-tail research agent
For agents that hit a question no named platform answers. It searches the sources, reads the schema and fetches rows from the one that fits. Uses sources, schema and run.
Ideas · Explore
Explore is good for questions that need a public site the named platforms do not cover. Each idea below uses three operations: sources and schema to find a source and price it for free, then run to fetch the rows.
Updated 21 October 2026
For agents that hit a question no named platform answers. It searches the sources, reads the schema and fetches rows from the one that fits. Uses sources, schema and run.
For data teams. It browses the whole source index for free and keeps a list of what each source returns and its price per row. Uses sources.
For analysts on a budget. It reads the money estimate from schema before any run, so the cost is known first. Uses schema and run.
For researchers and writers. It runs one source once and keeps the rows as evidence to read and cite. Uses run.
For builders whose agent uses the named platforms. When those do not cover a site, the agent tries explore before giving up. Uses sources and run.
For teams that track one public site. It runs the same source with the same input every week and compares the rows. Uses run.
For founders. It pulls a small sample from a source to see whether the data is useful before building anything around it. Uses schema and run.
For analysts. It fetches raw rows and keeps them unchanged, so every claim in a report can point back to a row. Uses run.
For data teams. It runs two sources that return similar data on the same input and compares coverage and price per row. Uses sources and run.
For agent builders. The agent reads what each source returns from sources and picks one before it spends. Uses sources.
| Idea | Operations | One call returns | Main operation price |
|---|---|---|---|
| A long-tail research agent | sources, schema, run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A source catalogue for a data team | sources | The source index, free | sources: quoted per call |
| A cost-checked data pull | schema, run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A one-off dataset for a report | run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A fallback step in an agent pipeline | sources, run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A weekly pull from one source | run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A quick test of a data idea | schema, run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| An evidence collector for analysts | run | Up to 100 rows | run: quoted per call |
| A source comparison | sources, run | Up to 100 rows per source | run: quoted per call |
| A data question router | sources | Matching sources, free | sources: quoted per call |
The source's own rows, raw and unmapped. Treat them as evidence to read and cite. For a named platform, its own endpoint answers with checked fields.
No. Both are free. Only run is billed, per row the source actually returns.
Each call is priced by its quote. A call can carry a minimum, so send it first with "estimateOnly": true. The quote is free and is the most the call can cost.
Yes. It signs itself up with one call and gets $0.10 free, quotes each call before it spends, and pays from a prepaid balance. "maxUsd" caps every call, and only a person can add money.
The playground runs any endpoint by hand: pick a platform and what you want from it, fill a short form named in plain words (or press Use sample input), see the free quote on the Run button, run it, then read the answer as a table or JSON and download it as CSV or JSON. The same call is written out as cURL, Python and Node while you type.
Why people pick API for Agents
API for Agents is independent and not affiliated with or endorsed by LinkedIn or any company named here. LinkedIn is a trademark of LinkedIn Corporation; other names belong to their owners. Public data only: nothing behind a login.